Rotgar Research · Aesthetic clinics · United States

Aesthetic Clinic AI Search Visibility Across Four Platforms

A US aesthetic-clinic query panel comparing answers and cited source sets across ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode.

Direct answer

Track the aesthetic procedure and the platform separately

We tested 18 fixed US-English aesthetic-clinic questions across four platforms in three same-day waves. The panel covers neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers and laser skin resurfacing in New York City, Chicago and Miami.

ChatGPT: 54/54 checks contained an AI answer; Gemini: 54/54 checks contained an AI answer; Google AI Overviews: 43/54 checks contained an AI answer; Google AI Mode: 54/54 checks contained an AI answer.

Among 205 answer-bearing captures, 182 contained at least one eligible citation. The tables separate answer availability, cited-source overlap and repeatability; these are different observations, not interchangeable visibility scores.

216

Planned core checks

18 query cells × 3 waves × 4 platforms. Technical preflight is excluded.

18

Exact query cells

3 cities × 3 nonsurgical procedures × 2 wording variants.

180

Defined repeat-source pairs

Hostname Jaccard has a nonempty citation union; empty/empty sets are not counted as 100% stability.

Study at a glance

A fixed aesthetic clinic panel, separated by platform

Patient tasks
Neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers and laser resurfacing
Requested US markets
New York City, Chicago and Miami
Collection surfaces
ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode through DataForSEO
Repeated collection
Three same-day waves of the same 18 query cells
Fieldwork
Public evidence
Versioned data, prompts, pair tables, source ledger and reproduction materials

What the panel shows

Findings for aesthetic clinic teams

The same tracking sheet needs separate platform columns

ChatGPT: 54/54 checks contained an AI answer; Gemini: 54/54 checks contained an AI answer; Google AI Overviews: 43/54 checks contained an AI answer; Google AI Mode: 54/54 checks contained an AI answer.

Record whether an answer exists before assessing a named clinic or practitioner. A missing AI Overview is not a clinic losing a recommendation.

A repeated question is a baseline—not an implementation result

Mean within-query source-hostname Jaccard in this panel was ChatGPT 24.6% (54 defined pairs); Gemini 7.8% (38 defined pairs); Google AI Overviews 23.9% (34 defined pairs); Google AI Mode 15.2% (54 defined pairs).

Keep the exact wording, city, platform and collection date alongside each check. Compare repeated baseline observations before attributing a change to website work.

Inspect the cited page, not just the practice domain

1259 deduplicated URL occurrences were visible across the core answers. Treatment / services path was the largest conservative URL category (467 occurrences).

The URL-type table is a way to find procedure, practitioner and location pages worth inspecting. It does not show that adding a particular page caused an AI recommendation.

Neuromodulator, filler and resurfacing questions have distinct scopes

The procedure table keeps neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers and laser skin resurfacing separate in each system. The two wordings differ: one asks for clinics to compare; the other explicitly asks for the practitioner, clinic location and source evidence.

Use these segments to select procedure pages, named-practitioner profiles and branch-specific information for inspection. No automated clinic-accuracy or clinical-quality score is inferred.

Four platforms

What each platform returned for the fixed aesthetic-clinic panel

All 216 planned observation slots are retained. Captured outcomes separate an AI answer from a successfully completed check with no AI answer. Any gap between planned and captured slots is a technical collection state, documented in the methodology and observation download—not clinic-brand absence.

What each platform returned for the fixed aesthetic-clinic panel · Frozen public v1.0 panel
PlatformPlanned slotsCapturedAnswer-bearingNo AI answerWith citationsUnique URLsUnique hostnames
ChatGPT545454054346199
Gemini54545403110481
Google AI Overviews5454431143247123
Google AI Mode545454054197101

Treatment and task

Keep nonsurgical procedures separate

Each platform–task segment contains 18 planned checks: three cities, two wording variants and three scheduled repeats. Captured outcomes and answer-bearing captures have separate counts. No segment is weighted by patient traffic or query volume.

Keep nonsurgical procedures separate · Frozen public v1.0 panel
PlatformProcedurePlanned slotsCapturedAnswer-bearingNo AI answerWith citationsUnique hostnames
ChatGPTNeuromodulator injections18181801889
ChatGPTDermal fillers18181801883
ChatGPTLaser skin resurfacing18181801876
GeminiNeuromodulator injections18181801037
GeminiDermal fillers18181801134
GeminiLaser skin resurfacing18181801029
Google AI OverviewsNeuromodulator injections18181441454
Google AI OverviewsDermal fillers18181711749
Google AI OverviewsLaser skin resurfacing18181261253
Google AI ModeNeuromodulator injections18181801846
Google AI ModeDermal fillers18181801845
Google AI ModeLaser skin resurfacing18181801839

Repeated questions

How much did cited sources repeat within the same question?

Three pairwise comparisons are planned for each exact query–platform cell. Means use answer-bearing pairs with a nonempty source union. One-empty-source pairs count as zero; empty/empty pairs are undefined. The both-nonempty column is a separate sensitivity view.

Visible citation sets when the same aesthetic clinic question was repeated

Mean within-cell pairwise Jaccard. A larger value means more of the same cited sources, not better answers.

Exact URLsSource hostnames

ChatGPT

ChatGPT: cited-source stabilityExact URL Jaccard 18.0%. Source-hostname Jaccard 24.6%. 54 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 0 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.URLsHosts18.0%24.6%

54 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 0 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.

Gemini

Gemini: cited-source stabilityExact URL Jaccard 5.6%. Source-hostname Jaccard 7.8%. 38 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 16 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.URLsHosts5.6%7.8%

38 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 16 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.

Google AI Overviews

Google AI Overviews: cited-source stabilityExact URL Jaccard 15.9%. Source-hostname Jaccard 23.9%. 34 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 0 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.URLsHosts15.9%23.9%

34 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 0 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.

Google AI Mode

Google AI Mode: cited-source stabilityExact URL Jaccard 8.5%. Source-hostname Jaccard 15.2%. 54 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 0 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.URLsHosts8.5%15.2%

54 defined hostname pairs from 54 planned pairs; 0 source-empty/source-empty answer pairs.

How much did cited sources repeat within the same question? · Frozen public v1.0 panel
PlatformPlanned pairsAnswer pairsDefined host pairsBoth source-emptyOne source-emptyURL JaccardHostname JaccardBoth-nonempty host Jaccard
ChatGPT5454540018.0%24.6%24.6%
Gemini54543816145.6%7.8%12.4%
Google AI Overviews5434340015.9%23.9%23.9%
Google AI Mode545454008.5%15.2%15.2%

Matched source sets

How similar were source sets across platforms?

Matched pairs share the exact query and scheduled repeat label. Each platform combination has 54 planned matched pairs. Actual timestamps—including delayed recoveries—are retained. Only answer-bearing captures enter source-set comparisons; no-answer and technical-error pairs are not treated as empty source sets.

How similar were source sets across platforms? · Frozen public v1.0 panel
Platform pairPlanned matched pairsAnswer pairsDefined pairsBoth source-emptyHostname JaccardBoth-nonempty Jaccard
ChatGPT / Gemini54545402.2%3.8%
ChatGPT / Google AI Overviews54434303.2%3.2%
ChatGPT / Google AI Mode54545403.2%3.2%
Gemini / Google AI Overviews54434301.7%3.1%
Gemini / Google AI Mode54545402.5%4.3%
Google AI Overviews / Google AI Mode544343011.6%11.6%

Source-page structure

What kinds of citation URLs were visible?

Counts are unique URL occurrences within an answer, then summed across answers. The same URL can recur in different answers. Categories use conservative hostname/path rules, not a content-quality or ranking-factor assessment.

What kinds of citation URLs were visible? · Frozen public v1.0 panel
PlatformURL categoryCitation occurrencesAll citation occurrencesShare
ChatGPTHomepage13953625.9%
ChatGPTTreatment / services path19853636.9%
ChatGPTPractitioner / team path115362.1%
ChatGPTLocation / contact path295365.4%
ChatGPTEditorial path15360.2%
ChatGPTKnown directory / social host335366.2%
ChatGPTUnclassified path12553623.3%
GeminiHomepage1513311.3%
GeminiTreatment / services path6613349.6%
GeminiPractitioner / team path01330.0%
GeminiLocation / contact path91336.8%
GeminiEditorial path61334.5%
GeminiKnown directory / social host21331.5%
GeminiUnclassified path3513326.3%
Google AI OverviewsHomepage163344.8%
Google AI OverviewsTreatment / services path11233433.5%
Google AI OverviewsPractitioner / team path33340.9%
Google AI OverviewsLocation / contact path83342.4%
Google AI OverviewsEditorial path53341.5%
Google AI OverviewsKnown directory / social host263347.8%
Google AI OverviewsUnclassified path16433449.1%
Google AI ModeHomepage2825610.9%
Google AI ModeTreatment / services path9125635.5%
Google AI ModePractitioner / team path42561.6%
Google AI ModeLocation / contact path92563.5%
Google AI ModeEditorial path02560.0%
Google AI ModeKnown directory / social host122564.7%
Google AI ModeUnclassified path11225643.8%

Selected source-page follow-up

A predetermined source-page follow-up

The first declared citation in the selection-wording query of scheduled wave 1 supplies one slot per city × procedure × platform: 36 slots. A delayed same-input recovery can fill its original failed slot and is flagged in the download. No alternate wording or more convenient citation replaces the selected source.

A predetermined source-page follow-up · Frozen public v1.0 panel
SlotPlatformCityProcedureSelected sourceReview stateTreatment detailPractitioner detailLocation detailContact detailFee / payment context
Q01ChatGPTNew York CityNeuromodulator injectionsdorisdaymd.com/pages/neuromodulatorsInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q02GeminiNew York CityNeuromodulator injectionsmedspafind.com/blog/best-med-spas-in-new-york-city-2026Inspected static pagePresentUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedPresent
Q03Google AI OverviewsNew York CityNeuromodulator injectionsgetplump.com/blog/botox-cost-nyc-2026Inspected static pagePresentUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedPresentPresent
Q04Google AI ModeNew York CityNeuromodulator injectionsm.yelp.com/searchPage request blockedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q05ChatGPTNew York CityDermal fillersdorisdaymd.com/pages/fillersInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q06GeminiNew York CityDermal fillersicreativez.com/aesthetics-clinics-local-map-city/best-aesthetics-clinics-new-york-city-2026.htmlInspected static pagePresentPresentUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedPresent
Q07Google AI OverviewsNew York CityDermal fillersdrarielostad.com/combined-surgical-non-surgical-facial-rejuvenation-nycInspected static pageUnknown / not assessedPresentPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q08Google AI ModeNew York CityDermal fillersnextpatient.co/p/3178/providersuninspectable_booking_static_shellUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q09ChatGPTNew York CityLaser skin resurfacingmountsinai.org/care/ent/services/facial-plastic-reconstructive-surgery/laser-resurfacingInspected static pageUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q10GeminiNew York CityLaser skin resurfacingdermatologyandlasergroup.comInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q11Google AI OverviewsNew York CityLaser skin resurfacing—No selected source: no AI answerUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q12Google AI ModeNew York CityLaser skin resurfacingnextpatient.co/p/4588/providersuninspectable_booking_static_shellUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q13ChatGPTChicagoNeuromodulator injectionschicagodermatology.comInspected static pageUnknown / not assessedPresentUnknown / not assessedPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q14GeminiChicagoNeuromodulator injectionschicagoaesthetics.com/med-spa-treatments/dysportInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentPresent
Q15Google AI OverviewsChicagoNeuromodulator injections—No selected source: no AI answerUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q16Google AI ModeChicagoNeuromodulator injectionsm.yelp.com/searchPage request blockedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q17ChatGPTChicagoDermal fillersgoogle.com/maps/placeNavigation / booking surfaceUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q18GeminiChicagoDermal fillersimagelabmedspa.com/locations/chicagoInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentPresent
Q19Google AI OverviewsChicagoDermal fillersmarcoellismd.com/facial-surgery/non-surgical-facial-rejuvenationInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentPresent
Q20Google AI ModeChicagoDermal fillersm.yelp.com/searchPage request blockedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q21ChatGPTChicagoLaser skin resurfacingericksondermatology.com/services/lasersInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentPresent
Q22GeminiChicagoLaser skin resurfacing—not_applicable_answer_without_sourcesUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q23Google AI OverviewsChicagoLaser skin resurfacing—No selected source: no AI answerUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q24Google AI ModeChicagoLaser skin resurfacingnextpatient.co/p/6421/providersuninspectable_booking_static_shellUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q25ChatGPTMiamiNeuromodulator injectionsmed.miami.edu/departments/dermatology/divisions-and-programs/cosmetic-dermatologyInspected static pagePresentPresentUnknown / not assessedPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q26GeminiMiamiNeuromodulator injectionsmonacomedspa.comInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentPresent
Q27Google AI OverviewsMiamiNeuromodulator injectionsm.yelp.com/searchPage request blockedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q28Google AI ModeMiamiNeuromodulator injectionsmiamiderm.as.meuninspectable_booking_static_shellUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q29ChatGPTMiamiDermal fillersskinassociatesfl.com/dermatology-doctors-miamiInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q30GeminiMiamiDermal fillersthecliniccompass.com/miami/best-med-spasInspected static pageUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedPresentPresent
Q31Google AI OverviewsMiamiDermal fillersm.yelp.com/searchPage request blockedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed
Q32Google AI ModeMiamiDermal fillersuclinicmiami.comInspected static pagePresentUnknown / not assessedPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q33ChatGPTMiamiLaser skin resurfacingmiamidermatology.com/cosmeticInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q34GeminiMiamiLaser skin resurfacingmiamidermatology.com/cosmeticInspected static pagePresentPresentPresentPresentUnknown / not assessed
Q35Google AI OverviewsMiamiLaser skin resurfacinglumidermstudio.com/blog/microneedling-vs-laser-miamiInspected static pagePresentPresentUnknown / not assessedPresentPresent
Q36Google AI ModeMiamiLaser skin resurfacing4everyoung.zenoti.com/webstoreNew/services/aa5224a4-0aa9-47b6-a5a4-8b88fb7d6e63uninspectable_booking_static_shellUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessedUnknown / not assessed

Of 36 predetermined slots, 32 selected a source (31 distinct URLs). The follow-up inspected 20 unique substantive static pages, represented in 21 slots. Among those 20 inspected pages: treatment detail 16, named-practitioner information 15, location information 12, contact information 18, and fee/payment context 10.

Slot incidence and unique-page counts are separate. A repeated selected URL was fetched and inspected once; procedure evidence is evaluated for the procedure in each slot.

True means a positive finding within the stated inspected scope. Null means unestablished, not absent; uninspected images, dynamic content, tabs, linked pages and entire websites are outside the inspection.

Named-practitioner information is not license verification or proof of a practitioner/branch/treatment relationship unless that relationship is explicitly documented.

Fee/payment context is not a verified treatment quotation. Publisher support contacts, navigation-only names and testimonial-only practitioner names do not establish the corresponding clinic evidence.

Answer narrative checks are bounded qualitative comparisons, not a provider-accuracy rate, clinical assessment or proof that a citation caused a recommendation.

Private raw answers and HTML/text snapshots are not redistributed. Public notes contain paraphrases rather than provider-name examples, full-answer text or body quotations.

The source-page follow-up describes this deterministic citation sample, not every page on a practice website. Missing page evidence and an inaccessible page remain distinct from a factual contradiction.

Practical interpretation

Turn the evidence into an aesthetic clinic work list

For a clinic owner or marketing lead, the useful next decision is which service, practitioner and branch information to inspect—not whether one blended AI visibility number went up.

Keep treatments and platforms separate

Use the procedure-level table to organize neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers and laser resurfacing as different patient questions. Keep ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overviews and AI Mode in separate reporting columns.

Inspect the source behind the answer

Start with the selected-source ledger. On your own website, check whether the treatment page identifies the practitioner, actual clinic location and consultation route. Keep an inaccessible page separate from a page you have inspected.

Recheck the same questions

The repeat-source comparisons show why a baseline needs more than one answer. Record the exact question, platform and date before using a later check to prioritize the next change.

Choose the next practical step

Use the aesthetic clinic AI visibility guide for a page-by-page review. The commercial service page explains audit, agreed implementation and repeat-check responsibilities.

Methodology

How the aesthetic clinic panel was collected and analyzed

Fix the aesthetic-clinic panel before collecting answers

The protocol and 18 exact query cells were fixed before paid collection. Three convenience-selected US markets were crossed with neuromodulator injections, dermal fillers and laser skin resurfacing, using ordinary-selection and practitioner/branch/evidence wordings. No practice brand was seeded in a query.

Collect the four surfaces separately

DataForSEO LLM Scraper collected ChatGPT and Gemini. ChatGPT used force_web_search=true. The initial Google segment used Live endpoints. After repeated upstream technical failures, a prospective execution overlay admitted same-provider Standard queue delivery for remaining Google checks and four exact-input recoveries. AI Overviews retained depth 10 and asynchronous loading; AI Mode retained its separate Google surface. Responses retain actual delivery mode and collection time. US-English country-level location 2840, desktop and Windows settings were used; city names were explicit in the query.

Returned model labels — ChatGPT: gpt-6; Gemini: 3.5 Flash-Lite. Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode did not return model-version labels. This collection does not establish equivalence to every signed-in consumer session.

Keep repeats and collection states visible

The core contains 216 scheduled observation slots: three sequential same-day waves, 54 per platform. 5 diagnosed original temporary failures received separately admitted same-input recovery. Four Google failures were recovered through normal-priority Standard queue delivery before completion of the first wave. The separately admitted Live Gemini recovery occurred only after all original first-pass slots were terminal. Original and recovery modes and timestamps remain in the observation metrics. There were 221 core requests in total. 10 technical collection attempts are excluded: 6 preflight attempts across 4 fixed technical cells and 4 separately admitted diagnostic probes. 359 read-only queue GET calls retrieved already-posted tasks; they are not additional observation attempts.

205 final core slots contained an AI answer; 11 checks returned no AI answer; 0 retained an unresolved collection error. Original failure states and both timestamps remain in the public observation metrics. Scheduled repeat labels are not a claim that delayed recoveries occurred in their original chronological wave. Provider-side caching was not controllable.

Count final-answer citations and source-set similarity

ChatGPT/Gemini use the provider’s declared final-answer sources, not unused search results. Google uses references inside top-level AI answer items, not ordinary organic listings, local packs or People Also Ask. URLs are deduplicated within an answer after hostname/www, tracking, fragment and trailing-slash normalization. Hostname means the normalized host, not corporate ownership.

Jaccard is intersection divided by union. Empty/empty citation sets are undefined, one-empty sets are zero, and both-nonempty summaries are reported separately. Within-query comparisons match exact query and platform; cross-platform comparisons match exact query and scheduled repeat label. Delayed recoveries are not represented as chronologically simultaneous captures.

Inspect a fixed first-reference source sample

The qualitative sample uses the first plan-ordered selection wording, scheduled wave 1, then the first declared normalized citation. A same-input recovery of a temporary failure may fill that original slot later; the source ledger flags recovery and actual timestamps. No-answer, no-source and unresolved-error slots remain explicit. Dated source-page evidence supports only what was actually visible on that page.

The published codebook classifies URL navigation patterns conservatively. Treatment paths take precedence over generic location or practitioner prefixes. A path label is not a review of page quality or proof that a particular block caused a recommendation.

The public data omit full AI answers, API identifiers, credentials and private ClinicTruth project information. They retain prompt cells, observation metrics, citations, pair inputs and review evidence needed to inspect the analysis.

Interpretation and limitations

  • This is an exploratory same-day panel of 18 convenience-selected query cells, not a representative estimate of all US aesthetic-clinic searches or practices.
  • The two wordings request different information; their differences are not an isolated causal prompt experiment.
  • Cities were named in the query. Physical city IP, signed-in personalization and provider-side caching were not controlled. Delayed missing-only recoveries widen the window for their original repeat slots.
  • Citation overlap describes visible reference sets, not provider quality, clinical suitability, patient demand or the hidden causal source of a recommendation.
  • URL-path categories are conservative navigational proxies. Selected source-page facts do not establish that a website feature causes AI inclusion.
  • No website intervention was applied. The practical aesthetic-clinic guide combines observed findings with Rotgar’s interpretation rather than claiming proven ranking factors.

Download and reuse

Download the public v1.0 research materials

Inspect the prompts, denominators and source sets behind the findings. The public package is available without an email gate under CC BY 4.0. Full AI answers, API credentials and internal collection identifiers are not redistributed.

text/csvPlatform results · CSV

Answers, citations and repeatability, with exact platform denominators.

1.1 KBsha256:0ec0beb0878da429e1bedddc83b10b138921c7bd8e7f30c2e7ce6503bc68d6e9
application/jsonComplete public data · JSON

The sanitized observation metrics, citations, pair tables and source follow-up in one file.

1.1 MBsha256:394b2cd2b9eff0df23965430608804ed326287900be88e3a1336ce86bc76edb3
text/csvExact aesthetic-clinic questions

All 18 fixed city, nonsurgical procedure and wording cells.

2.9 KBsha256:773797222d8751c60ff4d1faf69fcc9ae3c3f73f35e0b1a02942931c45d22946
text/csvObservation metrics

All 216 planned core observations, including no-answer and collection-error states.

37.1 KBsha256:64dcf94bf9d42e84ae8d72a79f95788f616aa0ffadc95e93c8bfb05e88fca3f3
text/csvDeduplicated answer citations

Normalized answer references and conservative URL-path categories.

241.9 KBsha256:be9cd67add83bd24a43d9b1bb59a7510e0392b4897747cf82489447675de86a6
text/csvRepeat-source comparisons

All 216 within-query pairs and the source-set eligibility rules.

25.8 KBsha256:f262e7794e18cd6104bd124c0cdf5a7ec8b9aa101f931661a4b37490ec3caeed
text/csvCross-platform source comparisons

All 324 matched pairs across the six platform combinations.

38.7 KBsha256:010c10f8ab4f550af5a04e52fc25e35acaf186df83d0430a5ce19d2205452bb8
text/csvCited page types

Platform-level navigational URL categories; not a ranking-factor score.

2.2 KBsha256:f1ca951f8bd85616562a498e18abd72373ed342979f1bd3090a9494b76c0e0f5
text/csvSource-page follow-up

All 36 predetermined first-reference slots and their review evidence.

45.2 KBsha256:2a47e4119c91aed6fb43dbee6e9c12fb4188c3d027ff906bcb442051b81bd015
text/markdownMethodology and definitions

Collection, exclusions, denominator choices and interpretation boundaries.

6.4 KBsha256:62a001152d726a7d61108c48b3837429101b5d3468ddc432e15f0ab61d2d70d2
text/plainReproduce the aggregate checks

Run the dependency-free Node.js checks against the sanitized public tables.

9.1 KBsha256:779b615a50a96f498c05ad064556e79acb9b3a1ee43a6c51ced4ecc3333d719c
text/plainCitation metadata

Original v1.0 metadata; use the version DOI in the research record for current citation.

442 Bsha256:61a132f73c46e00ae71cbc32944b96ab55fb5c4eefd1941e7e51eb262ba61c8e
application/jsonFile manifest

Public payload inventory, byte lengths and SHA-256 checksums.

5.6 KBsha256:553cc609d0f0574c8fd08b4414274c012cb233ff9c4a161798628ce7d852f8d3
text/plainVerify the package

Checksums for every payload and the manifest.

2.2 KBsha256:c9cab5c2df4b5876ec08bce6f303023eaed274a10ce31e5a40ac92a555ddca26

Citation and research record

A separate, versioned aesthetic clinic dataset

Yudin, E. (2026). Aesthetic Clinic AI Search Visibility Across Four Platforms (Version 1.0) [Data set]. Rotgar Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23693457

Author
Evgeniy Yudin, Founder and Strategy Lead · ORCID
Publisher
Rotgar Research
Published
Fieldwork window
–
Version and license
1.0 · CC BY 4.0

AI Visibility Audit

See how AI answers describe your aesthetic clinic

The AI visibility audit starts with one clinic or selected location, one priority market and one patient language.

Best fitClinics, hospitals and medical groups in:
  • Dental
  • Aesthetic medicine
  • Physiotherapy
  • Fertility & IVF
  • Dermatology
  • Hair transplant
  • Cosmetic plastic surgery
  • Mental health
  • Multi-specialty groups
  • Your current visibility and named competitors
  • The sources AI answers cite
  • A prioritized list of improvements to implement

Need to cover several clinics, locations, countries, markets or patient languages? Book a 30-minute call We’ll discuss the scope for your organization.

AI Visibility Audit

Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT + Gemini.

  1. 1Contact
  2. 2Priorities
  3. 3Focus

Step 1 of 3: Contact

Step 1 of 3

Contact details

Enter at least one contact: email or WhatsApp.

Step 2 of 3

Audit priorities

Step 3 of 3

Search focus

What are you most interested in?

Do not include patient records or confidential health information.

Your request is sent securely to Rotgar.

The audit uses public data. Account access is not required.

We will confirm the scope and that the audit is in progress within 2 business days. The initial report will be delivered within 6 business days.