Compare how procedure questions introduce providers and cite clinic information; record when no AI Overview appears.
- “What should I compare when choosing a dermal-filler clinic in [city]?”
- “Which clinics offer laser hair removal in [area]?”
Medical niche · Aesthetic medicine
Find where patients encounter your injectables, filler and laser services in ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode. We audit the answers, improve the agreed website pages and check again.
ChatGPT · Gemini · Google AI Overviews · AI Mode
What you get · Aesthetic medicine
Find out whether AI recommends your medspa for the nonsurgical services you provide—and names the right practitioner and branch. Your team receives the saved answers, competing providers and a procedure-by-procedure work list, then chooses implementation by Rotgar or its existing website team.
We test concern-led and named-procedure questions for your injectables, laser and skin-treatment priorities. Each finding retains the answer, competing clinic, practitioner attribution and source URL, so a missing service is distinguishable from an inaccurate clinic description.
You get: A platform-separated baseline, the competing clinics named and a prioritized work list for your procedure pages.
We improve priority procedure pages, practitioner profiles, clinic-location links and relevant structured data. Your website team has a named owner for changes it retains, while we deliver the work assigned to Rotgar.
You get: Approved procedure, practitioner and branch-page changes, with an owner and completion record for each task.
We repeat the agreed questions and compare the clinic, procedure and practitioner described. The review identifies remaining omissions, incorrect service associations and the next changes worth making.
You get: A saved before-and-after answer review showing which descriptions, sources and omissions changed.
Aesthetic medicine priorities
Injectable consultations, laser hair-removal enquiries and skin-rejuvenation comparisons should not disappear into one ‘aesthetics’ category. We choose your priority service lines before building the baseline.
Check whether dermal-filler and injectable-service searches name your clinic, the practitioner who provides the service and the correct consultation route—not an unrelated beauty business.
Check whether laser hair removal or resurfacing answers distinguish the procedure from a device brand, and whether the named technology is actually available at that location.
Check whether a group-wide menu is being attributed to every medspa branch, including services or practitioners available only at selected clinics.
Queries and prompts
Illustrative examples. We adapt the test set to your nonsurgical procedures, practitioner titles, US city and patient language. The agreed audit scope keeps each platform separate.
What must stay separate
A mention is not automatically useful. We check which service and provider the answer attaches to your name.
Injectables and laser services must not imply that your medspa offers a facelift or other cosmetic operation. Shared ownership does not make those services interchangeable.
A product name does not establish the treatment offered, the operator or an approved indication. We keep branded references tied to clinic-confirmed procedure information.
A page about pigmentation or facial ageing can organize relevant consultations without selecting an intervention for the reader or promising a particular cosmetic result.
What we improve
We map concern pages to distinct nonsurgical procedure pages, then connect each to the practitioner, real clinic location and consultation route. This is website and AI-answer work, not a Google Maps optimization package.
Give injectables, laser hair removal and resurfacing their own service context rather than a reusable list of devices. State which practitioner and clinic the page describes.
Link documented professional titles and relevant procedure experience to services that person actually provides. Do not present every practitioner as the operator for the entire menu.
Show which procedures, practitioners and contact paths belong to each branch. Preserve those relationships when the same aesthetic brand operates several clinics.
Results to compare
Keep the prompt set and market recorded. We compare saved answers before and after changes; a provider mention is separate from correct practitioner attribution or a cited procedure page.
Reported separately for ChatGPT and Gemini.
Approval boundary
Rotgar delivers AI visibility research and agreed implementation. Your team supplies the facts needed to describe your aesthetic business accurately.
Relevant next step
Original aesthetic-clinic evidence
Our four-platform aesthetic-clinic study includes a fixed follow-up of the first cited source pages. In the static text of 20 unique inspected pages, we found:
Procedure information
16 of 20
The requested injectable, filler or laser procedure was described.
Practitioner information
15 of 20
Named practitioners or professional roles were visible.
Location information
12 of 20
Branch or location information was visible.
A selected-source review, not a clinic scorecard: practitioner information does not by itself establish who provides each procedure at each branch. Details not established in the inspected text remain unknown.
We use these distinctions to build practical website tasks: keep procedure pages working, connect the practitioner and branch, explain published fee conditions and keep public service information alongside booking.
In the same 216-check US panel, AI Overviews produced an answer in 43 of 54 checks while AI Mode did so in all 54. Your audit keeps those platforms separate rather than treating one Google AI result as the other.
Inspect the selected-source findingsOur earlier August 2026 aesthetic source study found mean exact-URL overlap with Google Top 20 of 11.9% for ChatGPT (36 checks) and 45.9% for Gemini (27 checks). Mean similarity between ChatGPT and Gemini’s cited-domain sets was 3.1% across 27 matched pairs. These source comparisons are why each assistant’s links are reviewed separately.
For your marketing team
Use the practical guide to choose procedure-level questions, inspect practitioner and branch details, review the cited pages and repeat the checks across four platforms.
Read the aesthetic-clinic AI visibility guideWorking together
For aesthetic clinic owners, medical directors and marketing teams
Best suited to nonsurgical clinics with named practitioners and a website implementation contact. Bring your injectables, laser or medspa priorities, locations and current marketing team to the call.
Review data and access requirementsOngoing implementation
From USD 1,000 / month
Audit scope and subsequent work are agreed separately. Monthly scope depends on services, practitioners, locations, markets and implementation needs.
See pricing and scopeBefore working together
A focused check of how ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode describe your injectables, laser and other nonsurgical services. We turn the saved answers and sources into specific procedure-page, practitioner-profile and branch-information changes. Your agency can implement agreed tasks, or Rotgar can deliver the scoped website work. Paid ads, social media and Google Maps management stay with your existing team.
See the AI visibility service scopeYes. Start with a priority such as dermal fillers or laser resurfacing, the practitioners who provide it and the branch you want represented. The initial work list focuses on that procedure’s pages, practitioner links, location information and consultation route. Other medspa services can follow after the first scope is reviewed.
Yes. We record the clinic brand and named practitioner separately, then check which procedure and branch the answer associates with each. Your clinic confirms the practitioner’s current title, responsibilities and actual service locations; Rotgar maps the resulting profile and procedure-page priorities.
The tested questions, platform and capture dates, saved answers, named competing clinics and cited pages, followed by a prioritized implementation list. Each task identifies the affected procedure page, practitioner profile, branch detail or external source and the team responsible. Rechecks use the recorded questions so your team can inspect the follow-up.
Yes. Agree which procedures and practitioners belong to each selected branch before the checks. We look for answers that attach a group-wide treatment menu or an injector to a location where they are not available, then specify the affected branch, procedure and profile changes. This is not a Google Maps management package.
AI Visibility Audit
The AI visibility audit starts with one clinic or selected location, one priority market and one patient language.
Need to cover several clinics, locations, countries, markets or patient languages? Book a 30-minute call We’ll discuss the scope for your organization.